Kindergartners Who Use iPads Score Better on Literacy Tests

Is technology a good thing for children? Some parents think it can be a great education tool. But others think that plopping a kid in front of a desktop, tablet or smartphone is just plain lazy.

A recent study shows that 52% of kids surveyed between the ages of 5 and 8 have used tablets and smartphones. The same study showed that 10% of the kids under the age of 12 months have used a tablet or a smartphone. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Another question is whether too much time using technology makes people socially awkward. In one study conducted by Badoo, 39% of those surveyed spent more time socializing online than face-to-face and 20% prefer texting or communicating online to talking face-to-face. Does that mean that children who use technology grow up to be socially awkward?

In a more recent study, Kindergartners in Maine who used iPads in the classroom ended up scoring better on literacy tests than those who didn’t. Students in the iPad classes outperformed non-iPad students, on average, across every literacy measure they were tested on.

What are your thoughts? Should there be an age limit for kids using technology? If not, then how much is too much? 1 hour a day? 2 hours a day?

And if you do allow your children to use tablets and smartphones for entertainment, what are the best apps you’d suggest? Do you even know what apps your kids are using?

Read the infographic below and let us know your thoughts.

The New Nanny: Tablets and other Mobile Devices Teach and Entertain Kids
Courtesy of: Schools.com

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Print Friendly
  • Robert Clay

    I *KNOW* kids who use iPads do better and learn faster. My 6 year old is considered to be 2-3 years ahead of the rest of his year on both reading and writing. I can attribute a lot of that to him using an iPad at home. He taught himself to search for whatever he wanted. At the start he would enter 60 character search terms into Google with no spaces between words. Amazingly it always found what he was looking for. Gradually his spelling and ability to write coherent sentences with properly spaced words has come on by leaps and bounds. My 4 year old is, if anything, ahead of him. They both have the incentive to read and write because they immediately find out about anything that piques their curiosity. I feel sorry for kids who don’t use one. It is no coincidence that East Asian countries have the world’s best education these days. Places like Korea have already replaced text books with tablets. And it’s having a big effect already.
    As for limiting the use of such technology, yes, it should be limited. We don’t like our kids to use them more than about 2 hours a day. They get plenty of benefit from that, and they also have plenty of time for a more traditional life. 

  • http://www.60SecondMarketer.com Jamie Turner

     Robert —

    I suspect the reason your child is 2-3 years ahead of his peers is because he has your genes! LOL.

    Thanks for stopping by and sharing your comments with us.

    Cheers,
    Jamie

  • http://twitter.com/ckwilde CKWilde

    Robert is absolutely right. Kids do learn better. My oldest (now 23) received a V-tech when he was 6 for reading and math skills — old technology by today’s standards. In first grade, our son was reading at the 8th grade level. I

  • http://www.profromgo.com/pittsburgh-web-design-firm-launches-iphone-android-mobile-app-development-service/ David N.

    Huh, good to know.  Definitely flies in the face of the people who claim that looking at a screen “rots your brain.”  Perhaps we should stop trying to force “old-fashioned” books on kids, and help them to embrace reading on their mobile devices.  Ultimately, I’m guessing that the old format of reading / getting content is going to go by the wayside, anyway.

  • Amandah

    I’ll play the devil’s advocate for a moment. It’s great if technologies such as the iPad are helping children increase their reading and math aptitude. But who’s teaching kids about respect? Who’s teaching kids about teamwork? Who’s teaching kids about “life laws” such as the Law of Cause and Effect? With the latest bullying incident of a 68-year-old grandmother, perhaps, technology is helping kids to ‘emotionally detach’ from the ‘real world.’ If parents don’t teach their children right from wrong, how to respect themselves which will lead kids to respect others, and other soft skills, how will kids survive in the ‘real world when they reach adulthood? What will happen to our society? What will happen to the U.S.? Why are some parents relying on technology and teachers (for that matter) to teach their kids EVERYTHING? Where has the responsibility of the “parent” gone? If people have no desire to raise children, if people have no desire to be responsible or be held responsible for the upbringing and education of children, they don’t have to have them. It’s not fair to children, and it’s certainly not fair to society who pays for it one way or another.

  • http://www.60SecondMarketer.com Jamie Turner

     Hi, Amandah — I’m a parent, too, and ask myself the same questions. One columnist who I’ve grown to respect over the years is John Rosemond. He can be a bit old-school occasionally, but overall, his points are good (when it comes to child rearing).

    Thanks for stopping by.

    – Jamie

  • Jonny

    iPads open up a whole new world of opportunities for fun and exciting learning. Enjoying HOW you learn is the first and most important step. The iPad will give you that boost!

  • http://www.60SecondMarketer.com Jamie Turner

     Jonny, I agree with you 100%!

  • Pingback: Are iPads And Other Technology In The Classroom A Good Thing? | My LifeCubby

  • http://twitter.com/appsined Apps In Education

    How we educate young minds is very important. Providing them with a mix is the key. Technology plays a very important role. Schools are investigating how they can engage students. Technology seems to be that tool that has been always been inserted into the conversation. However the most important component of this experience will be the applications (or apps) and what adults do with students while they are using these tools. Learning is NOT passive. 

    http://www.appsineducation.com

  • David

    I agree with your comment to Robert, Jamie. We must keep in mind that correlation does NOT indicate causality. It may be that kids who use tablets score better on reading skills because those parents are promoting a reading environment in MANY ways, not just by tablet use. And those other ways of promoting reading – access to books in their home, trips to libraries, encouragement and praise when kids read alone, reading WITH our kids – all these contribute MUCH more than technology. Be careful to keep building PERSONAL CONNECTION with your kids. Technology will often usurp that if we aren’t very diligent about it. I used to let my kids play video games only 1 hour per day. They said “Dad, we have games that the levels are so long they can’t be completed in 1 hour! So we must start over each day and we will NEVER get past those levels”. Should I cave and allow more than 1 hour per day? NO! I used that as a lesson opportunity in financial matters as well – I taught them to “Save Up” for 2-4 days, play NO video games the 1st few and then they would have enough hours to complete any level they needed. It worked. :)

  • Dave McClure

    We must keep in mind that correlation does NOT indicate causality. It may be that kids who use tablets score better on reading skills because those parents are promoting a reading environment in MANY ways, not just by tablet use. And those other ways of promoting reading – access to books in their home, trips to libraries, encouragement and praise when kids read alone, reading WITH our kids – all these contribute MUCH more than technology. Be careful to keep building PERSONAL CONNECTION with your kids. Technology will often usurp that if we aren’t very diligent about it. I used to let my kids play video games only 1 hour per day. They said “Dad, we have games that the levels are so long they can’t be completed in 1 hour! So we must start over each day and we will NEVER get past those levels”. Should I cave and allow more than 1 hour per day? NO! I used that as a lesson opportunity in financial matters as well – I taught them to “Save Up” for 2-4 days, play NO video games the 1st few and then they would have enough hours to complete any level they needed. It worked. :)

  • http://www.60SecondMarketer.com Jamie Turner

     Hey, David –

    I agree with pretty much everything you said. And I especially love the fact that you taught your kids about finances by letting them save up their time on video games. That’s brilliant.

    Also, the causation/causality issue rings true as well. In fact, the original research on this was a small sample size — one school district in Maine — so there’s no telling if this is statistically viable data that will prove out, or simply an isolated example.

    Thanks for stopping by. Good points, indeed.

    Cheers,
    Jamie

  • http://marketingwizdom.com/ Robert Clay

    Great advice. I like it.


The 60 Second Marketer is an online community that provided tools, tips and tutorials for marketers around the globe. It was founded by Jamie Turner, co-author of "How to Make Money with Social Media" and "Go Mobile." For more information about the 60 Second Marketer and Jamie Turner, visit the "contact" link at the top of this page.

© 60 Second Marketer