Posts tagged ‘Google’

December 9th, 2011

Social Media Measurement Tools for the Small- to Mid-Sized Business

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

There are so many different tools around that help you to measure the efficacy of your social media campaigns, it can be extremely difficult to know where to start and what to use. Before proceeding much further, I want to emphasize that this post considers the requirements of SMBs, and therefore assumes a modest budget.

The many dimensions you can track can be quite bewildering and are described using terms like ‘engagement’, ‘velocity’, ‘influence’, ‘sentiment’ and ‘signal.’ All of which, it seems to me, are pretty meaningless in business terms. Of course there are terms that do convey more meaning, such as ‘followers’, ‘comments’, ‘retweets’, ‘mentions’, and ‘likes’, but the question remains – do these lead to positive business behaviors?

I suggest that starting point has to be to challenge yourself about what you are trying to achieve, and then use the tools that best measure the behaviors you employ to meet your business objectives. Not too helpful perhaps, but unfortunately, while there are many free or moderately priced tools, they all measure different things and are driven, it would seem, by different motives.

I have tried a wide variety of the available tools in an effort to find a basket of products that I can recommend to my clients. My findings are based on my own use of these tools. I won’t pretend any rigorous process has been applied here; my views are pragmatic and reflect my perceived value in each case.

I will start with a couple of the tools that try to set the standards for influence and social capital respectively:

Klout

There are a wide variety of social media tools available for small- to mid-sized businesses. Here is a list of some of the top social media measurement tools you can use to track your campaigns.

Klout is allegedly ‘The Standard for Influence’, but what does that mean? Does a high Klout score mean you have a high level of influence? If so, does this enable you to add value to your bottom line, and is the value you add proportionate to your influence score?

Right now there seems to be much argument about changes to the Klout algorithm and whether or not it measures all of the components it claims to. There is also plenty to suggest that Klout can be ‘gamed’, and I have certainly seen evidence of certain people who seem to spend more time giving and receiving ‘K+’ and tweeting about it than anything else.

It also seems that Bots can gain high Klout scores without ever making any effort to ‘engage’ with their audience. Interestingly those that are most vehement in their detraction of Klout are those whose scores have declined. I wonder if this directly impacted their businesses or just their egos?

In its current form I find it difficult to see what Klout’s measure of influence really is, this is because it seems that the same Klout score can be obtained by people who:

1. Just get on with the stuff they do well – a positive outcome
2. Spend a lot of time gaming the system – a pointless outcome
3. Have no interaction with anyone – a negative outcome

PeerIndex

PeerIndex claims to ‘Understand your social capital’. Again, I am not sure that I yet know how to apply this in a business meaningful way. However if this is an index that measures an individual’s propensity to value social relationships, and to cooperate and collaborate with others within and across networks, then I think this is a reasonable method of indexation.

PeerIndex scores seem less volatile than Klout, and seems not to be driven by the same demand to ‘feed the system’. It also appears that there is less ability to game the system, and I sense that PeerIndex is less likely to attract or reward celebratory.

On balance those that score well on Klout for the ‘right’ reasons, also score well on PeerIndex.

Is it any better or worse than Klout? I think it is simply different, and doubtless still evolving. I guess I am slightly more drawn to it than Klout, but I still find it difficult to translate this to something business meaningful for my clients.

Okay, so in my book at least, I am no further forward. So where else might I get a general perspective on how my social media interactions measure up? Let’s have a look at some of the tools that are designed to make the management of all of our social streams a little easier, and along the way provide some sort of health check on how we are doing.

Sprout Social

Sprout Social is certainly one of the more user friendly products out there. It comes in a number of different guises and prices, which define how many profiles you can track and the extent of analytics data you have access to. I am limiting my views to the entry level ‘Pro’ plan costing $9 per month, which has limited measurement tools. However this does include some key data, so you can get basic demographic information, and details such as followers, clicks, retweets etc. shown as trend charts.

You also have a bar chart which tracks ‘influence’ and ‘engagement’. These are both a little easier to understand than perhaps the more pretentious measures used by PeerIndex and Klout. Yes they can be ‘gamed’ by pumping out high volumes, re-tweeting incessantly, and the like, but there is perhaps less motivation to do this because you would only be fooling yourself, rather than trying to impress a wide audience. (Gosh did that sound cynical!).

As you go up the range of plans, so the extent of monitor and measurement tools increases, including in the DeLuxe plan integration with Google Analytics, which is where I believe this all starts to get real.

So a nice tool with good functionality, and some measurement capability, however at the ‘Pro Plan’ level I still don’t see how these measures necessarily fuel my bottom line. Upgrading to DeLuxe at $59 per month, will, I suspect, begin to answer the questions.

CrowdBooster

CrowdBooster is quite an interesting toolset that allows you to manage your Twitter and Facebook accounts, 1 of each in the free account, more in the paid accounts.

The measures provided are relatively basic, but provide a useful gauge of your daily and accumulated activity, including total followers, tweets, mentions and retweets. It also provides a nice graphic representation of the potential reach of your retweets.

Other charts show follower growth, tweets, retweets and mentions over the past week, month, all time or a custom period.

It also shows you who your most influential followers are (that word again, this time influence is measured solely by numbers of followers) and identifies those who retweet you.

Recommendations appear from time to time suggesting you follow or follow back certain people, or respond to someone who mentioned you.

So if you have any conversion metrics that can equate business generated, relative to retweet reach or similar, then maybe this is for you. Otherwise it is one of many tools that provide a dashboard of your overall ‘busy-ness’ but not necessarily business.

Others

There are no shortages of tools in this broad category, most of which will provide some volumetric based measurements reflecting your activity levels. They all have different strengths and weaknesses and which, if any, you choose will be largely based on personal preference. I quite like CoTweet, but I can’t get to grips with MarketMeSuite. Sendible has lots of functionality, but lags behind real time significantly and is rather ‘clunky’ to use. Twaitter soon, allegedly, to become Gremln is potentially useful, but right now seems to be very unreliable.

If you are still reading, I’m grateful, but you must wonder where this is leading. Well I’m going to fast forward over more Twitter products than you can shake a stick at, but do investigate them, oneforty.com is the place to find out about this vast range of tools.

So what can you measure and how? Well I’m a big fan of sticking to the basics, and trying to work out what will prompt a business interaction. Not surprisingly this leads me back to the hub of most marketing campaigns – the website.

Google Analytics

I firmly believe that using Google Analytics will best inform most businesses of the efficacy of their marketing campaigns. The key is to identify the outcomes that are most likely to result in business, and define these as goals within Google Analytics. To understand this in more detail my article “How to measure the success of an internet marketing campaign” might help.

Having determined what website visitor interactions lead to business generation, it is now possible to cast your net wider and look at how social interactions might generate more website visits and, in turn, how these can fuel business growth.

Google Analytics enables you to determine the origin of traffic to your website, so the first step is to look at the traffic that comes from social properties such as Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin etc. Are your campaigns and the content you generate through your blog encouraging prospects to visit your site for more information? Are your efforts being rewarded with comments on blog posts, sharing of your content and updates, etc.? If not, it really doesn’t matter what your Klout score is, or how much ‘signal’ you generate.

By starting closest to the point where you turn interested bystanders into supporters, advocates and customers, you can quickly and easily determine which of your social interactions are most likely to fuel this process.

Google Analytics will at some stage integrate Post Rank into the product set to further enhance the ability to track social activity. The inclusion of ‘Share This’ or ‘Add This’ capability along with ‘Like’ and ‘+1′ functions will all help to determine what content is most engaging. Measuring comments, trackbacks and pingbacks by using an enhanced comments tool such as ‘Disqus’, will again show you what impact you are having. At present all of these tools provide analytics which will help you monitor these activities. With PostRank integration into Google Analytics it is likely that much of this information will also become integrated.

So let me, at long last, wrap this up.

All of the social tools will continue to evolve and develop, and as they do will doubtless offer more meaningful measurements. There is increasing evidence of many of them providing an interface into Google Analytics, which suggests to me a growing awareness of the need to set meaningful business measures.

There are plenty of reasons to exploit the rich portfolio of tools available to help you manage the increasing volumes of social activity, but use them for this purpose. If you have determined what social interactions drive business and you can relate those to a measure offered in any of these tools then that is a useful bonus. But please don’t waste effort modifying your social behaviour to influence these scoring systems, modify your social behaviour to support your business.

 

Peter Rees is an independent Internet Business Consultant. He specializes in a metrics based approach to internet marketing, making extensive use of website analytics and website performance auditing tools to best inform and advise his clients. He is a strong advocate of the need for companies to implement a formal Social Media Strategy, supported in turn by Social Media Policies and measurement

August 30th, 2011

Top 7 SEO Mistakes to Avoid

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

As a marketer, you probably spent a lot of time and effort crafting your website to help catch potential customers’ attention, capture new leads, and ultimately generate new customers. However, if your website does not rank well in the top search engines, odds are that you will never get in front of your prospective clients and all of your hard work will be wasted. While Search Engine Optimization, or SEO, can be a complicated process, if you steer clear of these top 7 on-site mistakes, you’ll be on your way to a better ranked page.

SEO blocks1.)    Targeting for the Wrong Keywords: Choosing what keywords you want your site to rank for is a critically important part of the SEO process and unfortunately, one that commonly fraught with mistakes. When deciding what keywords you want your site to rank for, make sure you are taking the perspective of someone who would be searching for information that your site provides. Instead of picking words that just describe your site, ensure that you pick words that are commonly searched by end-consumers.

2.)    Keyword Stuffing: A few years ago, you could cram a bunch of keywords into a poorly written article with little context and satisfy the search engine’s keyword density requirements. However, since then the people over at Google and the other main search engines have wised up, and now sites can actually be delisted on the engines for content that contains keywords but is not contextual or helpful. Bottom line: make sure your content contains keywords, but still delivers value to the end-reader.

3.)    Overuse of Flash: Flash allows you to create some interesting visuals on your site, but while those cool graphics may be eye catching to your users, all of the content within Flash is completely invisible to search engines whose crawlers are unable to read it. To rank higher on search engines, limit your use of flash or provide an html version of the site that is easier for the crawlers to read.

4.)    JavaScript Navigation: JavaScript is often used in navigation for websites. However, much like Flash, search engines have a hard time reading JavaScript. This is a problem when used in navigation because engines cannot follow your links and assign appropriate authority to your pages. You can still use JavaScript, but make sure you create a sitemap that the engines can crawl or put links in a noscript tag.

5.)    Focusing Too Much on Meta Descriptions: A meta description is the text that a user will see under a search title when browsing through search engine results. This text is important as it may help drive higher CTRs once users have reached the search result page, but it is no longer used as a ranking factor in any of the major search engines. This means that while you should craft good marketing copy that will entice users to click on your link, your time may be more effectively spent crafting title tags and other SEO elements that will get your page moving up in the rankings.

6.)    Not Having Fresh Content: Fresh content indicates to search engines that your site is relevant, and thus ranks higher in search results. Therefore, having a site that remains untouched for months at a time is a surefire way to tumble in the search results. An easy way to ensure that your site is being updated frequently enough is by adding a blog to your site. Update it with relevant articles and polls 3 to 4 times a week to help boost your page rank.

7.)    Thinking SEO is a One-Time Project: SEO is not a one-time exercise. Auditing your site and completing major overhauls to site structure and other SEO cornerstones is only the beginning of the SEO process. You must continue to upload keyword-rich content, maintain best practices when creating title tags, and continually be looking for sources for inbound links in order to stay on top in the search engines.

Sometimes SEO can feel like a moving target, with the search engines continually switching algorithms and never fully disclosing their methods. However, if you can manage to avoid these mistakes, you are on your way to SEO success.

Posted by Nicole Hall, Account Manager with Mobilize Worldwide. Mobilize Worldwide develops mobile apps, mobile ad campaigns, mobile websites and just about anything else related to mobile marketing for brands interested in growing their sales and revenue using this new and emerging medium.


                
July 13th, 2011

What You Need to Know About Google+

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

We have made our Kindergarten teachers proud. After the countless scuffles over playground toys and ear-shattering tantrums debating whose turn it is, it seems that this generation has embraced their teachings like no generation before us. We have truly mastered the art of sharing.

We can’t go five seconds without checking in on Facebook, posting photos to Instagram, or Tweeting our latest thought, and now, it appears we will be adding Google+ to the growing list of sites we compulsively check.

A Quick Look At Google+

Do you think Google+ will be the success that Google is hoping for?

After several underwhelming forays into the social realm, many analysts are speculating that this time, Google has gotten it right. Despite the fact that invites to the site have been limited, some 3rd party sources are estimating that the new network has already reached 10 million users and might hit 20 million by the weekend.

So what makes Google+ so intriguing? Despite many conflicting theories on this matter, the main draw for Google+ appears to be the fact that they have new, cool features that attempt to address some of the shortcomings of Facebook.

First, the Circle feature allows you to instantly create groups amongst your friends or centered around common interests called “Sparks.” You can then share specific content with only the people in that particular circle. Annoyed that your mom, grandmother, professor and boss all just friended you on Facebook? On Google+, you can put them all in a specific circle and share updates about studying, attending church, or cooking while saving the pics from your weekend trip to Vegas for another circle.

Another new and different feature is the “hangout” feature for when you want to interact with your friends live. Though Facebook recently announced they are partnering with Skype to come out with a video chat feature, Google+ beat them to the punch with “hangouts.” Just let your friends know that you’re free for a “hangout” and you can join as many friends in a video chat as your heart desires.

In addition to these features, some people on Google+, including Digg founder Kevin Rose and writer MG Seigler, reported that the real-time comments section and +1 feature (which has been available on search pages and other web properties for several months now) are good for driving more interaction with their followers.

However, there are some downsides. Many Google+ people complained that their feeds could easily get spammed with content and comments from other followers, making it difficult to find information. Additionally, users are surprised to see a few key components missing, such as a search functionality, iPhone access, and perhaps most importantly, profiles for businesses.

Google has declared that they will be coming out with business profiles soon, complete with deep analytics and the ability to integrate with AdWords, but as of now they are asking brands to refrain from creating profiles on the network. This, in combination with the fact that there is currently no paid advertising space, has some people wondering how Google+ will affect marketers.

The impact on marketers is hard to determine and much is yet to be seen in the way that Google+ will grow, but for now it’s simply a new tool in our marketing tool belt. According to Raphael Rivilla from BKV, “Google+ is very cool, so some people will migrate, but there will be others that won’t. This is just yet another place to interact with our targets.”

Posted by Nicole Hall, Account Manager with Mobilize Worldwide. Mobilize Worldwide develops mobile apps, mobile ad campaigns, mobile websites and just about anything else related to mobile marketing for brands interested in growing their sales and revenue using this new and emerging medium.

June 30th, 2011

23 Questions That Help Determine Your Page Rank

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

Just when you’re getting the hang of things, Google changes the game. As the search engine giant has phased in their new search ranking algorithm, Panda, over the past few months, some websites have watched in dismay as their site rankings have tumbled.

In order to address questions regarding the changes, and what exactly constitutes as a “Quality Site” in Google’s eyes, the company released a series of 23 questions that webmasters can ask themselves to help predict where their pages will fall on the all-important search results page.

Google's Insight Into Pagerank

Google's 23 newly released questions provide a bit of insight into the mystery of the search engine algorithm.

The questions are as follows:

  • Would you trust the information presented in this article?
  • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
  • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
  • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
  • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
  • Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
  • Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
  • How much quality control is done on content?
  • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
  • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
  • Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
  • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
  • Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
  • Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
  • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

While any information about their algorithm is a welcome change from the tight-lipped Google, the insights from this list aren’t exactly revolutionary. Most of these questions address issues that we’ve already known affect site rankings. Namely, that your site will rank well if your website and authors have authority, your content is researched and well written, the site provides a positive user experience and it doesn’t appear that you are trying to game the system by loading content with irrelevant keywords.

These broad generalizations are of course important, but are by no means a golden ticket to a #1 page rank. In order to answer these questions satisfactorily, companies must implement an SEO strategy and execute  tasks such as finding strong writers with expertise, building authority via inbound links, and deciding which keywords they want their site to rank for, all of which take time.

Therefore, it is important that marketers view this small peak into the search engine as an evaluation tool for an ongoing process, as opposed to a roadmap to a final destination. To make the most out of this information, use it to assess your current site, establish an SEO strategy, and to continually evaluate your site and the content you’re publishing.

Get Posts Like These Delivered to Your In Box Each Morning:
If you like what you read today, you can have these blog posts delivered to your in box each morning by clicking marketing blog. Or, you can sign up for our free weekly e-newsletter by clicking marketing newsletter.

Posted by Nicole Hall, Account Manager with Mobilize Worldwide. Mobilize Worldwide develops mobile apps, mobile ad campaigns, mobile websites and just about anything else related to mobile marketing for brands interested in growing their sales and revenue using this new and emerging medium.

April 25th, 2011

What the Changing Landscape of Search Means for You

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

Google.  It’s a search engine. It’s an operating system. It’s a verb. It’s a noun. It’s everywhere. And when people consider search engine optimization and paid search, often Google is the only site that comes to mind. However, according to Experian’s Benchmark and Trend Report, even though Google is still the dominant force in search, people have begun changing the way they look for information in 2 ways that will affect marketers in the next few years.

What the Changing Lanscape of Search Means for You

According to Experian, 2010 was the first year that Facebook beat Google in traffic.

First, Google has been steadily losing share to both Bing and Yahoo for 2 years now. Even though Google still is still the biggest player, with an overwhelming  68% of the market, Bing and Yahoo have enough pull in the search engine market to make their platforms  an important consideration when running paid search and SEO programs.

Though the search engines do not disclose how they rank sites, it is apparent that each uses a slightly different method which causes rankings to vary across platforms. It is important to make sure that your site ranks highly for your selected keywords on all three sites and adjust your SEO efforts appropriately if it does not. Similarly, it may be worth looking at running your paid search campaigns across all platforms to ensure the greatest reach possible.

However, more important than shifting share within the search engine market, is the trend away from search engines as a whole. Instead of visiting Google to find information about the brands they’re interested in and to compare products, 17% of adults are going to social media sites such as Facebook to find this information.

There are several possible reasons for this. First, may be because many people are already going to Facebook to network, interact with their friends, and share their opinions and would rather stay within the site instead of navigating away to a brand’s website. Second, social sites frequently have comments and recommendations from other users, which, according to eConsultancy, 82% of people take into account before making a purchase.

Regardless of the reason, there are implications when you are setting up your Facebook page. While you should always use social media sites as an engagement tool and to foster community, you also should have the important information about your company and products easily accessible to users.

Make sure that your brand page is easily searchable and identifiable within Facebook by filling out as much information about your company as possible. Also, use the “about” section as well as custom tabs to feature products and promotions and always prominently feature links back to your website so consumers wanting more information can navigate there easily.

Google is one of the most successful companies in the marketplace today, and they are no doubt going to continue to dominate the digital space for years to come. However, it is important to realize how people are diversifying the way that they search for information about your industry, company and products. With the sources of information on the internet continuing to grow it is important to project a consistent and highly visible brand image across all of the platforms that people use to find out about your company.

Posted by Nicole Hall, Account Manager with Mobilize Worldwide. Mobilize Worldwide develops mobile apps, mobile ad campaigns, mobile websites and just about anything else related to mobile marketing for brands interested in growing their sales and revenue using this new and emerging medium.

December 7th, 2010

Is Mass Marketing Dead? Yes, According to Robert Clay.

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

By Robert Clay, Founder and President, Marketing Wizdom

I don’t write new blog posts every day, as some people do, but this one is a biggie if you own, run or manage a business, and also an important one if you haven’t fully embraced or adapted your marketing approach to today’s vastly changed business landscape.

There's a new paradigm in marketing, according to Robert Clay, one of the U.K.'s most respected marketers. Do you know what the new paragigm involves? Read on to find out.

The end of mass marketing

For 150 years mass marketing was about the ONLY economical way to get your message out there. If you had a better mousetrap and could gather up enough money to tell enough people, you could push it on the world and you’d probably sell enough to build a good business.

But mass marketing is no longer viable for most businesses today, nor is it wanted or trusted by buyers. And I’ll explain why.

An award winning advert from the 1950’s

Let’s start by turning the clock back 60 years to an award winning magazine advert. It featured a veteran buyer sitting solemnly in his chair facing the would-be salesperson and declaring:

I don’t know who you are.

I don’t know your company.

I don’t know your company’s product.

I don’t know what your company stands for.

I don’t know your company’s customers.

I don’t know your company’s record.

I don’t know your company’s reputation.

Now—what was it you wanted to sell me?

The ad concludes:

‘Moral: Sales start before your salesman calls—with business publication advertising.’

That classic advert was created by McGraw-Hill Business Publications, to sell print advertising. The common wisdom at the time was just to get your message out there. But things have now changed. And how.

Print advertising is in steep decline today for reasons I’ll explain. But this award-winning 60-year old advert is still a great ad and it still vividly illustrates the tasks and challenges that you—and everyone in business—face in turning suspects and prospects into loyal customers.

Or does it?

While the barriers to doing business mentioned in that ad are still as relevant today as they were 50-60 years ago, buyer behaviour has changed beyond recognition in recent years, making mass marketing irrelevant for most businesses. Here’s why …

The escalation of commercial clutter

The first big change was the escalation of commercial clutter. That’s when we all started to be bombarded with sales and marketing messages at every turn. Where for years there were only three television channels, suddenly there were hundreds. And a similar proliferation has occurred in just about every area of the media.

In his book Data Smog, Surviving the information glut, David Shenk states that the average American encountered 560 daily marketing messages in 1971. By 1996 it was estimated that the number had increased to over 3,000 messages a day, with each of us seeing more ads in a single year than people of 50 years earlier saw in an entire lifetime. Today the numbers are believed to be somewhat greater still.

This continual assault of advertising and marketing messages has had a pronounced effect on buyers: There are so many messages out there that most people have become extremely adept at blocking them, tuning out all messages that aren’t highly relevant; or those which take extra effort to process. They also remember ads and marketing messages less and less, if at all. And even when buyers DO remember advertising and marketing materials, their retention is scarred by cynicism or, at best, indifference.

Take emails for example. The average email opening rate in early 2010 was 11%, a figure that has been falling for years. That implies that 89% of all mails are never even opened or looked at. Why? because most of them just aren’t important enough to devote any time to. And email, of course, is just one of many message delivery mediums.

In other words billions of dollars, Euros, pounds and other currencies worth of marketing spend just disappears down the plug hole unseen, unwanted and unappreciated every single day.

Because of this deluge of advertising and marketing messages, people are increasingly sceptical and distrustful of what they read or see. They automatically apply a ‘discount factor’ to the sales and marketing messages they see and they’re far more likely to make decisions based on what they hear directly from other people—friends, experts, their own online research, or even salespeople. While mass advertising still has a role, it should be one of the last parts of a marketing strategy today, not the first.

So commercial clutter is out of control, and it is very difficult for you to get noticed in all that clutter. If you sell business to business the people you’re dealing with are not only dealing with all that clutter, they’re probably also dealing with your competitors.

But clutter is only one of several factors that have changed everything in recent years. The rapid development and embrace of the internet has also turned 150 years of mass marketing on it’s head.

Next came the internet. Then Google.

After commercial clutter came the internet. The internet started to go mainstream in the mid 1990’s. Now, barely 15 years later, and boosted by the widespread availability of broadband and wi-fi, it has become an indispensable part of daily life for hundreds of millions of people.

Google’s arrival moved the game on massively again. Founded in September 1998, Google’s online search first appeared on most people’s radar in 2000. Before long the company had single handedly changed the world as we knew it.

While the internet made information available before Google came along, Google made the world’s knowledge accessible — and that’s a big difference. Before Google it was hard to imagine that anyone in the world today, regardless of whether they’re in an emerging or a highly developed economy, could just go online, perform a search, and gather virtually unlimited information on any subject you can think of.

If commercial clutter was a major factor before the internet took off, you now also have to factor in the volume of data we’re all exposed to every day thanks to the internet and Google. Google CEO Eric Schmidt said in 2010 that more information is now produced every two days than had been produced in all time before 2003. That’s a staggering statistic.

This ability to search newspapers and magazines the world over for relevant content has had a devastating effect on traditional media. Google’s revolutionary and much more efficient advertising model—where advertisers are only charged when someone clicks on an ad, and where response rates are completely measurable—has decimated the traditional advertising business.

Traditional media want you to pay plenty of money to advertise with them. But they can’t tell you who your ad has reached, unlike Google. Even mediums that dominated their niches until recently, like Yellow Pages, have found that their business has all but vanished, and their very survival is now in doubt.

When people can find just about any information they need in a matter of seconds just by performing a Google search, they simply no longer need to use printed media like Yellow Pages, and even online directories represent an unnecessary extra step and are largely shunned.

If we want to know anything at all, we just Google it. By late 2010 Google had between 65% and 72% share of all US online searches and around 90% in Europe. The rise of Google has created a massive shift in buyer behaviour, resulting in a new age of mass empowerment …

The rise of the social buyer has turned everything on its head. Again.

Then along came social media, and buyer behaviour changed again.

Online bulletin boards, arguably one of the earliest forms of social media, were around long before the internet took off. And instant messaging burst onto the scene in 1996. But social networking as we now know it started in 2002 with the launch of Friendster and MySpace.

Of today’s big players, LinkedIn started in 2003, Facebook and YouTube started in 2005 and Twitter in 2006. By 2009, hundreds of millions of people were enthusiastically embracing social media. It reached a tipping point and became mainstream.

Facebook, initially only available to Harvard students, was launched to the public in 2006. Since then it has accumulated over 500 million users, half of whom log on every single day. By late 2010, Facebook accounted for one in six page views in in the UK (one in four in the US), with some users spending up to 5 hours a day on the site.

As I write this in late 2010, a Hitwise report shows that social networking is now the most popular activity on the web, accounting for 11.5% of all internet visits in the UK. That’s more than the combined visits to Google, Yahoo! And Bing. Facebook is now the web’s largest destination, with 55% of all visits to such sites.

A staggering 4 billion messages are now sent through Facebook EVERY DAY. It’s now a major force in online advertising too, with 23.1% share of the display advertising market, more than doubling its share in a year, according to ComScore. In comparison, Google only has 2.7% of that market.

Google, for now, remains the largest driver of traffic to UK sites. But 1 in 10 such visits now originate from Facebook, making it the second largest driver of traffic as well as the most-visited social network, with YouTube in a distant third place. Twitter, with it’s 175 million subscribers and 100 million tweets a day is also an extremely effective driver of traffic.

Social media has given rise to the social buyer, an increasingly large section of the population who use their social media connections to seek advice and guide their buying decisions. With the growth of traffic from social networking sites increasing at an astonishing rate, everything in marketing has changed yet again. And so has the behaviour of your buyers.

Don’t overlook the role of the smartphone …

Alongside social networking Smartphones have also become ubiquitous. An increasing number of your buyers today are empowered by instant online search, social media and enormously powerful, always-on, easy to use mobile devices that they carry with them 24/7/365.

These powerful pocketable computers are now the norm, not the exception. And they have made a huge difference to what can be shared. Phones, ironically, are now used less and less for phone calls and more and more for emailing, texting, searching, browsing the web, taking and sharing photographs and videos, playing games, taking notes and connecting to one another via Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.

Your buyers can now find whatever information they want in a few seconds, wherever they are, and whenever it suits them. And that has changed their behavior yet again.

We’re now in an age of mass empowerment

Fueled by the internet, broadband, sophisticated online search, social media, wi-fi and smartphones, we’ve now entered an age of mass empowerment, where your buyers (whether you sell to consumers or B2B), are in the driving seat. You can tell them whatever you like, but they no longer accept at face value what you tell them.

They can easily and instantly draw on a variety of sources for their information, balancing what they see, read and hear from multiple sources and making whatever decisions they feel are most appropriate to them.

And they don’t like, welcome or want unsolicited messages from you. Uninvited messages pushed out to the world may have been the norm for 150 years. But now that there are better, more personal, and more effective ways of communicating, uninvited messages are considered to be spam, and tolerance for them has plummeted. What was the norm is now unwelcome and even creates hostility.

Your buyers delete irrelevant emails, block popups, filter or report spam, and surf away from sites they dislike. They just don’t need these things because it’s so easy today to obtain relevant information from multiple trusted sources wherever and whenever it is needed. In other words buyers are no longer at the whim of marketers. And they don’t want to be.

In today’s age of mass empowerment your buyers decide for themselves who they’re willing to listen to; speak to; or believe. They also decide if, what and when they buy. They can easily locate and speak to people who already have experience of your product or service. And if they ever have a bad experience they can tell 10,000 (or 10 million) people in an instant at the push of a button. It’s a game changer of epic proportions.

In a few short years these new dynamics have entirely changed both your buyers’ habits and the way they do business. What works today is very different to what worked only 10 years ago. And with the pace of change accelerating as never before you no longer have the option of doing business the way it used to be done. That’s because with unlimited information at their fingertips wherever they are, your buyers no longer consume information or make decisions the way they did even 10 years ago.

And if that doesn’t already describe your current buyers, it soon will.

The barriers have multiplied

If the McGraw-Hill ad at the start of this article were rewritten today, it could easily be re-stated as follows:

You’re good at what you do

You take good care of your customers

They love and recommend what you do

You just need more of them …

But your prospects don’t know who you are

They don’t know your company

They don’t know your product or service

They don’t know what you stand for

They don’t know your customers

They don’t know your record

They don’t know your reputation

They’re surrounded by sales and marketing messages at every turn

They’re deluged by people who want to part them from their money

They’re cynical or indifferent to your claims

They’re resistant to new purchase opportunities

They’re more and more demanding

They probably already have a relationship with your competitors

They’re working harder than ever but still falling behind

They don’t need another relationship

They don’t have time to listen to you

They don’t read or respond to your emails

They don’t return your calls for months

THEY decide who they’ll speak to, and what and when they’ll buy

Now — what was it you wanted to sell them?

These barriers to doing business are very real today. They also destroy the economics of mass marketing for most people in business. In addition, your best customers and clients are also your competitors’ most sought-after prospects this very minute … and they’re everywhere just waiting for you to slip up.

You can deal with this as long as you embrace a new way of marketing, based on a new way of thinking.

The new marketing paradigm

Marketing used to be defined in terms of 4Ps. Product, Price, Place and Promotion. But with the rise of social media there is now a 5th P, “People.”

Good marketing today is NOT about interrupting people or blasting them with unwanted messages. Instead it is about building relationships, peer influence, trust and engagement with a self-selecting audience.

That entails precise targeting; finding and focusing only on high potential prospects rather than mediocre suspects; positioning your product or service effectively in the minds of your prospects, which includes telling your story; and building sufficient trust for prospects to elect to hear what you have to say; let you into their space; and, in time, share your story with their contacts.

It’s no longer about sending messages to your potential clients where 98% don’t want to know, but instead, as Internet Psychologist Graham Jones says, it’s about encouraging them to send messages to you. Do that and you’ll know precisely what’s on their mind and can respond with a targeted message that’s much more likely to connect … giving you a dramatically greater response rate, and no redundancy.

Instead of wasting time on marketing campaigns that are 98% ineffective, it’s about encouraging your prospects and customers to connect with you and ask you questions so that you can respond with the exact answers they need.

It wasn’t easy or economical to do this on any scale in the past. But today’s social media tools make it both easy and inexpensive. It’s not hard to do. But it does requires a large shift in mindset, which can itself be hard. You also need to know what you’re doing, and where you can combine the old ways with the new, because one slip up in what you say or how you deliver your product or service can cost you dear.

Doing your best may have been enough to keep you in business in the past. But in today’s age of mass empowerment you have to embrace new ways of doing things and adapt the way you do business. Then do your best. And if you don’t, then I’m sorry, but your competitors will eat you alive as industry after industry can already testify.

I am sure you have thoughts you can contribute to this topic. Maybe you can share examples to illustrate some of my points. If so, please share your perspectives below. We’d love to have them.

By Robert Clay, Founder and President of Marketing Wizdom, Milton Keynes, U.K.

January 18th, 2010

Apple iPhone Vs. Android: Which Strategy Will Win?

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

In the 1990’s, Apple almost died because it tried to build a higher-priced computer, with an operating system that ran only on its own computer. Apple struggled to compete against Windows, which ran on many brands of computers, and eventually controlled the market.

Is that happening again between the Apple iPhone and the Google Android operating systems? Henry Blodget of The Business Insider thought so.

He points out that Apple’s iPhone is enormously popular, with one reason being it has so many applications available for it. But Apple has closed down the iPhone by controlling the apps system,  and the purchasing of apps.  Developers create software that only can be used on the iPhone. Google is not. Sound familiar?

Gene Munster, Senior Research  Analyst for  Piper Jeffray, believes Apple is following the right strategy. He says in an interview by Blodget:

  • Apple’s iPhone is easy to use, and that is a huge plus for it
  • The apps have been locked down for iPhone use only, but it has 110,000 apps
  • App builders want to build for a widely distributed phone, which the iPhone is
  • Apple has 110,000 apps compared to 20,000 apps on the Android
  • Apple will be the leader in 5 years with 30-40% global market share, with Android following, and Nokia will struggle behind

So the popularity of the iPhone seems to be the strong point in Apple’s corner.

Are you an iPhone or an Android?

1. Does your company tightly control its products or services (like Apple)?

or

2. Does your company attempt to share its products or services with other companies to get a part of their market (Google)?

December 21st, 2009

Help Customers Find You on Google Maps for Free

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

googlemapHow are your customers finding you? If you’re a brick and mortar business, here’s a way to get Google users to your doorstep.

Google offers a way for you to enter your business onto those maps that show up in Google search results. You’ve seen the red arrows on Google Maps. Ever wonder how they got there? I always figured they paid college kids a buck ninety-seven to drive around and input that stuff. I don’t know, maybe they do.

The news is that starting last May 2009, you can enter an arrow for your business. You can enter your business name, type of business, address, hours, etc. You can also get statistics based on the clicks on the results. And it’s all free!

Here’s the skinny from Google:

There are well over 150 million searches a day on Google. That’s a lot of potential customers. Marketing is all about telling those potential customers about your business, and this is a free service that helps you do that.  Check it out and let us know how it works for you.

++++++

Go to Google Local Business Center

December 15th, 2009

Google Goggles Boggles: Changes Online Searching with Visual Search

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

goggles logo

Typing is soooo passé.

The cool people are using Google Goggles, a new visual search application that doesn’t require any typing in the search field. Instead, on your smartphone using the Android operating system, you can point the phone at an object, take a picture, and let Goggles find search results for that object.

For instance, point it at a brand logo, and get results on Google that match that brand. Take a picture of a landmark, and get detailed information about that landmark. Want to purchase a book that your buddy has shown you? Take a picture of it and let Goggles find the book, review it,  and compare prices from booksellers. And here’s one to impress your friends. Take a picture of the bottle of wine and get information about the wine, including the year and the winery. Or better yet, don’t let your friends see you getting the picture, and impress them with all you suddenly know about the vino. Hear them being impressed?

My personal favorite practical thing that Goggles does involves business cards. Instead of piling the cards in a corner of your desk drawer, take a picture and let Goggles put the information into your contacts for you. You can even call the person from the resulting scan with a single click.

This cutting edge technology provides yet another way for our customers to interact with our brand. The technology is still new, however, and they admit it isn’t perfect. But it has an intrigue that leaves us wondering where search engine technology is headed, and how it will affect the way we market our products online. Check it out.

September 30th, 2008

How Search Engine Spiders Work

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

Most of our gentle readers already know how search engine spiders work, but it never hurts to review some of the basics. What follows is an overview so that you’ll have a basic understanding of what goes on next time you visit a search engine.

As you know, there are three primary search engines — Google, Yahoo and MSN. Each search engine has a software program (called a search engine spider) that “crawls” the world wide web and “reads” the content of each web page. Once the search engine spider has read the content of the site (including things like the ALT tags and the META tags), it drops what it finds into an algorithm (which is essentially a fancy word for a “formula”) and figures out what that page in the website is all about.

When someone does a search for, say, “Discount Camera Gear,” the search engine does a ton of calculations to figure out what exactly it is you’re looking for. Included in that calculation is a visit to their gargantuan database which has their algorithmic analysis of all the websites on the planet.

With amazing speed, the search engine spits out a list of websites that probably match what you’re looking for. When you consider the vast amount of calculating power that has to take place in order to spit out 2.8 million websites in 0.33 seconds, it’s mind boggling. (Give it a try. We just typed in “Discount Camera Gear” into Google and, sure enough, it gave us 2.8 million web pages in 0.33 seconds. Do you know what a hassle it was to scroll through 2.8 million websites to check Google’s work? That took us forever!)

That’s essentially how search engine spiders work, which means you now know more about search engines than 83% of the people at your next neighborhood BBQ.

September 23rd, 2008

Coca-Cola, Interbrand and a Book Called “Branding Only Works on Cattle.”

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

Once again, Coca-Cola has taken the top spot in Interbrand’s list of the world’s most valuable brands. As is often the case, IBM and Microsoft followed closely behind. Google had a good run of events as well, jumping from #20 to #10 in just one year.

This isn’t the first time we’ve talked about Interbrand’s annual report in this blog. The report is essentially a barometer to test the “value” of any particular brand. But in a new book out by Jonathan Salem Baskin called “Branding Only Works on Cattle,” Mr. Baskin challenges the “math” behind Interbrand’s approach.  The book is worth buying if only because of the wonderful way in which Mr. Baskin disassembles Interbrand’s formula. Mr. Baskin’s point-of-view is summed up quite nicely at the end of this passage when he states, “This isn’t math, it is religious scripture, created to reaffirm belief to the flock while ginning up enough obfuscation to dissuade nonbelievers.”

But to say that’s the only time Mr. Baskin shouts “the emperor has no clothes” would be a disservice to the book. In fact, the main premise of the book is pretty extraordinary — that is, that the branding people who tell you it’s about what people think have it all wrong. It’s not what people think about your brand that’s important, it’s how people behave with your brand.

It’s a deceptively simple premise, but one that has profound implications. Baskin writes about Gillette’s introduction of the new Fusion — a five-bladed razor that consumers haven’t embraced. Why? Because it was built on a faulty premise of how consumers think about shaving, rather than how they want to behave when they shave. (Lagging sales would indicate that consumers want to behave by buying a simpler, less expensive shaving solution.)

Just when you thought you’d read everything you needed to about branding, along comes Mr. Baskin’s book that turns everything on its head. Mr. Baskin says that one of the most sacred tenets in marketing — brand theory — needs to be reinvestigated and turned upside down.

To be sure, the book offers plenty of arguable premises. For example, even though the Interbrand approach may include some arguable assumptions, it’s still the best thing we have. And, at a bare minimum, the Interbrand solution can be used as a way to compare your brand’s value relative to your competitor’s and that, in an of itself, has some value.

In any case, “Branding Only Works on Cattle” is a smart, insightful, well-written book that’s worth taking a spin through.  If you like Mr. Baskin’s approach, you can also follow him on Dim Bulb, his blog about marketing and branding.

September 2nd, 2008

Google Launches New Browser

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

The news is out — Google has launched “Chrome” — a new web browser to compete with Microsoft Explorer and Mozilla Firefox.

Some of the features include the following:

  • An “omnibox” that will automatically complete search suggestions, most-visited websites and the most popular pages. (Big Yawn.)
  • An “Incognito” window that will not log user activity and will automatically delete all cookies. (Small Yawn.)
  • Tabs that, unlike Firefox and Internet Explorer, actually shut down the connection to the website when closed. (Streamlined Usability — Now Yer talkin’!)
  • Open source architecture that allows users to suggest changes and improve the browser. (Most Excellent!)
  • A multi-tiered processing capability, which means Chrome can work on many things at once. (Oh Yeah, Baby!)

The bottom line? Like most Google products, this will be a big hit. Will it change the Internet? No. Will it change a lot of people’s choices for web browsers? You betcha.

August 11th, 2008

IPhone Software Sales Skyrocket

Share on TwitterSubmit to StumbleUpon

Apple has knocked it out of the park again. According to the consumer electronics company, users have downloaded more than 60 million programs for the iPhone in recent weeks. 60 million downloads!

If sales continue at this pace, they could reach $350 to $500 million per year in the very near future. According to The Wall Street Journal, even Steve Jobs was impressed. “I’ve never seen anything like it in my career in software,” he said.

Which brings up a good point — Apple isn’t just about the Mac, the iPod or the iPhone. It’s about a phenomenal user-interface and a software development process that’s unmatched by Microsoft, Google or any other developer.

Congratulations, Apple. You’ve hit a grand slam.

Again.


The 60 Second Marketer is a free online magazine brought to you by BKV Interactive and Direct Response. We try to provide quick updates on the newest tools, tips and techniques in marketing. We also try to accomplish that with a dose of humor or levity. As it turns out, we're pretty good at providing tools, tips and techniques, but we're not actually all that funny. Which would explain why people don't call us "funny" as much as they call us "laughable." Bummer. Our offices, for those of you who are interested, are located in Atlanta (404-233-0332) and Kansas City (913-648-8333). We also have offices on Bora Bora, but they don't have the phones installed yet.

© 60 Second Marketer, a division of BKV, Inc.